[Advaita-l] [advaitin] The 'Parabrahman' of Advaita

[Rajesh Benjwal]

Namaste,

Brahman OR para Brahman of advaita is "I am."

>> And this 'I am' jnAnaM should be upAdhi  rahita, vishesha rahita, kevala
svarUpa jnAnaM.   Then only we can bravely declare the below.

Even I may not declare it bravely but here we are talking about "prabrhama
of advaita" so that way ain't we talking about upAdhirahita caitanyam?

>>there is shiva, there is vishNu, there is jagadaMba and there indeed
vividha deva- devata-s and the difference in the worshipping of respective
deities in a vedic way  as long as we are identifying ourselves with
BMI.****

Ofcourse there is Shiva, there is Vishnu, I was saying that there is
nothing like prabrhama is Shiv OR Vishnu. Prabrham of Advaita is "I am." "I
am" the hero of the story :-). Do not we say in sandhya Asawadityo braham
brahmevAhamasmi?

Where there is Brahma alone from where the question of either Vishun is
Brahma OR Shiva is Brahma arises?

>>  yes, this upAdhi bheda  is not a problem in vyavahAra where there is
bhedha between upAsaka, upAsya, upAsanaM.  As long as we are not trying to
rank  the vishNu-shiva and to prove the supremacy of one over another, this
bheda is in a way good for the different ways of worship :-) ***

Correct :-)

Thanks for your nice input.








On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> praNAms
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> praNAms
> Hare krishna
>
> Brahman OR para Brahman of advaita is "I am."
>
> > And this 'I am' jnAnaM should be upAdhi  rahita, vishesha rahita, kevala
> svarUpa jnAnaM.   Then only we can bravely declare the below.
>
> There is nothing like it i Shiva or Vishnu.
>
> >  there is shiva, there is vishNu, there is jagadaMba and there indeed
> vividha deva- devata-s and the difference in the worshipping of respective
> deities in a vedic way  as long as we are identifying ourselves with BMI.
>
> There is only Brahman and "I am that Brahman" this is the understanding.
> Everything else is just upAdhi bheda.
>
> >  yes, this upAdhi bheda  is not a problem in vyavahAra where there is
> bhedha between upAsaka, upAsya, upAsanaM.  As long as we are not trying to
> rank  the vishNu-shiva and to prove the supremacy of one over another, this
> bheda is in a way good for the different ways of worship :-)
>
> Anyway, this is what my thought on bheda between vishNu & shiva in dvaita
> vyavahAra.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>
>


-- 


*Rajesh Benjwal*

 e:rbenjwal at gmail.com | w:ractors.com |
<http://facebook.com/rajesh.benjwal>

Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this
e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy.