[Advaita-l] sushupati anubhava of jnAni and ajnAni

[Rajesh Benjwal]

Namaste,

Thanks for the answer.

​>>
We have somany questions on waking and dream states since it varies from
individual to individual due to upAdhi-s bedha,  whereas nobody would ask
the question about one's anubhava of deep sleep state since it is the state
of ekaM or ekeebhUtaM or sarvOpAdhi vinirmuktaM. >>

Do not we accept AvaraNa shakti of avidhyA remain active in shusupati?

My question was regarding this AvaraNa shakti, if it works for both in same
manner.

If it works for both in same manner then there is possibility that jnAni
again could be ajnAni. Of-course it should not be like this, but why?


Thanks



On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> Is there a difference in sushupati of ajnAni and jnAni?
>
> praNAms
> Hare Krishna
>
> There is no difference in sushupti anubhava between ajnAni and jnAni,
> jnAni and jnAni, ajnAni and ajnAni since the 'experience' of sushupti is
> same for one and all.  Hence no question/doubt on the experience of deep
> sleep state.
> ​​
> We have somany questions on waking and dream states since it varies from
> individual to individual due to upAdhi-s bedha,  whereas nobody would ask
> the question about one's anubhava of deep sleep state since it is the state
> of ekaM or ekeebhUtaM or sarvOpAdhi vinirmuktaM.  However from the point of
> 'want of this svarUpa jnAna' it has been said that there is avidyA in
> jnAnAbhAva rUpa in sushupti for the ajnAni.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Advaita-l [mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org] On
> Behalf Of Rajesh Benjwal via Advaita-l
> Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 2:58 PM
> To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
> Subject: [Advaita-l] sushupati anubhava of jnAni and ajnAni
>
> Namaste,
>
> Is there a difference in sushupati of ajnAni and jnAni?
>
> An ajnAni sushupati anubhava is "I slept well, I do not know anything, I
> experienced sukham."
>
> A jnAni statement is also the same or it is different.
>
> If it is same then is it possible that after some brain-injury his wrong
> conclusion, I am body, based on avidhyA could come back.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
>
>
> *Rajesh Benjwal*
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>



-- 


*Rajesh Benjwal*

 e:rbenjwal at gmail.com | w:ractors.com |
<http://facebook.com/rajesh.benjwal>

Please consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this
e-mail message, ask yourself whether you really need a hard copy.