[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[श्रीमल्ललितालालितः]

bhAskara !
I appreciate your patience and the way you took personal criticism.
I request you to go through old mails which criticized you. They were not
full of personal criticism only.
If you get my point of view from them, then OK.
But, I'm sorry that I don't have that much time to dedicate to any
discussion like this.

I know from where you are talking.
I wish you could just put your view aside and try to get what my view
is/popular view is. You already know that, hence you started thread. It was
conflicting with your present understanding.
Now, I request you to put your understanding away for some time and repeat
what I said. I will clarify the meaning, if you fail to grasp. Once you
understand my point of view, you are free to compare that with yours and
find errors.


*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः*www.lalitaalaalitah.com

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Do you still want to continue this discussion with me prabhuji despite the
> fact that I am an un-traditional student of shAstra as per your observation
> ??  I am asking this question coz. I donot want you to waste your time in
> mundane discussion with me prabhuji.  Kindly don’t think otherwise.   BTW,
> if your answer is yes, I would like to say, yes, I was referring to
> chAndOgya and sUtra bhAshya only when I said rajju-sarpa and mrud-ghata
> examples are there to prove brahman’s nirvisheshatva, nishkriyatvaM and
> niravayavatvaM and at the same time for the jagat,  brahman is the only
>  abhinna nimittOpadAna kAraNaM.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
> *From:* श्रीमल्ललितालालितः [mailto:lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, March 21, 2016 10:38 AM
> *To:* Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
> *Cc:* A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva
> is brahman !!??
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
>
> Mrud-ghata, rajju-sarpa both examples have been given to prove brahma
> niravayavatva and jagat svarUpa.
>
>
>
> ​First of all, mRdghaTa is not for adhyAsa, it is for kArya-kAraNAbheda.
> See the prakaraNa of chhAndogya.
>
> rajju-sarpa is not for niravayavatva. It's for saying that every thing
> apart from brahman is superimposed. See brahmsUtrAdyAdhikaraNam.
>
> ​
>
>
>
> *श्रीमल्ललितालालितः*
> www.lalitaalaalitah.com
>