[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada
agnimile at gmail.com
Tue May 24 06:15:56 CDT 2016
Namaste Sri Chandramouliji,
I did refer to BhAshya support for DSV/EJV to you previously - sending it
"ब्रह्मैव स्वाविद्यया संसरति स्वविद्यया मुच्यते च" इति
बृहदारण्यकभाष्यात् is the reference to EJV/DSV in Br. bhAshya.
My original post to the list discusses DSV in Shankara bhashya,
posting that link again:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:16 AM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com
> I cant argue for others. But I presume DSV/EJV is different from
> ajAtavAda. However in this context would like to point out that I had
> earlier requested for a clarification if DSV/EJV is in accordance with the
> Bhashya. There was no response. I am not even suggesting that all advaitic
> viewsprakriyas must necessarily be in accordance with the bhAshya. I am
> not debating it here. But surely I would like to know the status in this
> regard for my personal use.
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:31 PM, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:24 PM, H S Chandramouli <
>> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Sri Venkatraghavan Ji and Sri Subrahmanian Ji,
>>> I am not disputing what you have said. I am not even debating SDV vs
>>> DSV. But as you are no doubt aware there are any number of advaitins who do
>>> not subscribe to DSV. That is why in my earlier post, I specifically added
>>> the words << in the view of its authors >>. I wanted to know
>>> authoritatively what the authors meant their work to be. Reason for my
>>> doubt also I had given therein. So I am not questioning or debating
>>> anything here. I am just seeking a confirmation regarding the authors'
>>> intentions. That is all.
>> Then, does it not follow logically, that those who have objections to DSV
>> have also objections to Shankara's bhashyas? How can they exclude Shankara
>> and target only the authors of the books where the word DSV/EJV is used?
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list