[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: The five pUrva pakshis of vaitathya prakaraNa

[Ravi Kiran]

>> Because by ignorance only (adhyAsa) world is concocted as separate in
the sat in waking and dream state.

True.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> *Is it not appropriate ? Why not we accept it, as another prakriya?*
>
> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Where did I deny it when shruti itself clearly saying tureeya is devoid of
> kAraNa shareera but prAjna is with it.  Shuddham nirmalam avidyAmalarahitaM
> iti kAraNa shareera pratishedhaH.  The pure being tureeya is free from
> avidyA that is causal body.  This indirectly shows the existence of the
> causal body in sushupti.  So we donot have any qualms with it.  The
> problems come with the interpretation of it out of context and saying even
> in sushupti Atma has the upAdhi and that upAdhi is kAraNa shareera.  The
> causal body means not knowing the reality (jnAnAbhAva).  This kAraNa beeja
> is like a mental form (kindly don’t take it literally as we are not giving
> any ‘shape’ to the kAraNa shareera in sushupti).  This is also called as
> avidyA Shakti or avidyA beeja (seed) in some texts by attributing the
> bhAvarUpa (an existing thing) to it.  Since the sushupti is upAdhi rahita
> state, jnana abhAva emerges only antaHkaraNa comes back to its normal
> function.  Anyway, it is noteworthy that elsewhere ( in the kArika I
> believe)  it has been said that sat itself accepted as the seed and nothing
> other than sat is accepted as the seed.  Because by ignorance only
> (adhyAsa) world is concocted as separate in the sat in waking and dream
> state.  Hope we are not digging again this complicated issue.  And This
> time I am really going to stop this prabhuji.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>