[Advaita-l] Vaadiraaja Teertha's Yuktimallika - Advaita Criticism - Slokas 1-10 to 1-13

[Ravi Kiran]

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 4:55 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Thanks. If so, how can they raise objections against Vedic statements
> itself ?
>
>
>
> Ø   By interpreting the veda vAkya in a different way like attatvamasi
> instead of tattvamasi J
>
>
> How will that lead to paramArtha jnAna ?


>
>
> without any conditions like advaitins :-)  because for us there is a state
> where 'atra veda aveda :-) ...but according to them (dvaitins) these are
> all inappropriate quotes from shruti to substantiate that everything is
> brahman.
>
>
> When it is so told in Vedic texts itself, Brahman is spoken of as being
> fishermen, etc., how can dvaitins consider them as inappropriate?
>
> Is it not more appropriate, the way Advaitin explains, that as sat svarUpa
> , everything is Brahman Itself ? ( from paramArtha stance)
>
> Ø     From paramArtha stance brahman is nirvishesha nirguNa niravayava
> not antaH prajNa nor bahirprajnA not even prajnAna Ghana under these
> circumstances how can he be chandaala, bitch, woman, man, boy, youth etc.
> ?? does your brahman is vikAri like this in paramArtha ??
>
In the statement, ananyatvam alone is told - "as sat svarUpa, an embodied
being is in reality Brahman", where is the question of vikAra when there is
no bhEda or tAratamya accepted anywhere, in atmaikatva jnAna ?


>  that is their point of objection and insist that we don’t have any
> legitimate right to quote shruti as pramANa when we comfortably putting
> everything (including veda)  under the mithyA category compartment J
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
Thanks