[Advaita-l] (no subject)
H S Chandramouli
hschandramouli at gmail.com
Sat Jun 24 09:51:11 EDT 2017
Namaste Praveen Ji,
In some contexts, when it is declared mAyA/avidya or jIva for that matter
is the cause of srishti, (cannot give references readily for this), , does
it not mean the same way?
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:08 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any upAdhi is active due to its association with Chaitanyam alone and
>> Chaitanyam gets the name of the upAdhi itself in that context. Thus
>> Chaitanyam itself is termed shrotraM, manaH etc.
> True Chandramouliji, but
> we wouldn't like to say Chaitanya itself is termed Maya and avidyA.
> That itself should settle not using the similar "तस्य तत्/ तस्याः सा"
> kind of phrases w.r.t. Maya/ avidyA.
> Kind rgds,
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
> That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list