[Advaita-l] (no subject)

H S Chandramouli hschandramouli at gmail.com
Sat Jun 24 09:57:21 EDT 2017


Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement. Sri Mani Dravid Shastrigal did
not mention mAyA or avidyA. They are just my question.

Regards

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:21 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Praveen Ji,
>
> In some contexts, when it is declared mAyA/avidya or jIva for that matter
> is the cause of srishti, (cannot give references readily for this), , does
> it not mean the same way?
>
> Regards
>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_6048752195345682842_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:08 PM, H S Chandramouli <
>> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Any upAdhi is active due to its association with Chaitanyam alone and
>>> Chaitanyam gets the name of the upAdhi itself in that context. Thus
>>> Chaitanyam itself is termed shrotraM, manaH etc.
>>>
>>
>>>> ​True Chandramouliji, but
>> ​we wouldn't like to say Chaitanya itself is termed Maya and avidyA.​
>> ​ That itself should settle not using the similar "तस्य तत्/ तस्याः सा"
>> kind of phrases w.r.t. Maya/ avidyA.
>>
>> Kind rgds,
>> --Praveen R. Bhat
>> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one
>> know That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
>>
>>
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list