[Advaita-l] (no subject)

[H S Chandramouli]

Before I totally forget, my thanks to Sri Subrahmanian Ji for the immediate
response.

Regards

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:27 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Just wanted to clarify my earlier statement. Sri Mani Dravid Shastrigal
> did not mention mAyA or avidyA. They are just my question.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:21 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Praveen Ji,
>>
>> In some contexts, when it is declared mAyA/avidya or jIva for that matter
>> is the cause of srishti, (cannot give references readily for this), , does
>> it not mean the same way?
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
>> www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
>> <#m_9151244482640666953_m_6048752195345682842_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:13 PM, Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 7:08 PM, H S Chandramouli <
>>> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Any upAdhi is active due to its association with Chaitanyam alone and
>>>> Chaitanyam gets the name of the upAdhi itself in that context. Thus
>>>> Chaitanyam itself is termed shrotraM, manaH etc.
>>>>
>>>
>>> ​
>>> ​True Chandramouliji, but
>>> ​we wouldn't like to say Chaitanya itself is termed Maya and avidyA.​
>>> ​ That itself should settle not using the similar "तस्य तत्/ तस्याः सा"
>>> kind of phrases w.r.t. Maya/ avidyA.
>>>
>>> Kind rgds,
>>> --Praveen R. Bhat
>>> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one
>>> know That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
>>>
>>>
>>
>