[Advaita-l] Vaadiraaja Teertha's Yuktimallika - Advaita Criticism - Slokas 1-511 to 1-524

[H S Chandramouli]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Vidyasankar Sundaresan via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

<< there is mounting evidence that not only can the human recovery of a
 past event be faulty in its process, but that a past event need not have
 even taken place and yet people sometimes "recollect" a memory of
 something.>>,

“mounting evidence” here pertains only to the current life, not those of
previous lives. Whereas the statement



<< our philosophical texts all more or less agree
that smRti can only be of things that have been actually experienced in the
past>>,



the past covers “all” the previous lives.



Thus the two are not comparable.



Regards

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:10 AM, Vidyasankar Sundaresan via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> To bring this discussion to a contemporary relevance, do read up on "false
> memory syndrome" and how it is often a result of the so-called "recovered
> memory therapy." Although our philosophical texts all more or less agree
> that smRti can only be of things that have been actually experienced in the
> past, there is mounting evidence that not only can the human recovery of a
> past event be faulty in its process, but that a past event need not have
> even taken place and yet people sometimes "recollect" a memory of
> something.
>
> Vidyasankar
>
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > Knowledge's validity is not because it is generated by pramANa, its
> > validity derives from it not being subsequently sublated. On the
> contrary,
> > one of the conditions for means to be pramANa is that it produces pramA.
> >
> > If the original knowledge was pramA when it was stored in memory, and
> > provided that it is recollected correctly, the memory is a valid
> > recollection of events that occurred in the past. One need not postulate
> > memory being a valid pramANa for it to produce an accurate recollection
> of
> > the past.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Venkatraghavan
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>