[Advaita-l] jeevo brahmaiva naparaH
agnimile at gmail.com
Thu Mar 16 06:35:43 EDT 2017
Namaste Sri Bhaskar ji,
I think the intention of what I said would apply to any statement related
to Brahman - including your own.
No worries though, ultimately everyone will come to the right understanding.
On 16 Mar 2017 10:20 a.m., "Bhaskar YR" <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> praNAms Sri Venkatraghavan prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
> An uncommon commonality in our view point hence happy to write :-)
> True. kArya and kAraNa are simply two words, the substance is only one.
> > Absolutely right.
> That being so, how can there be any sambandha when there is only one
> substance? Any sambandha, even tAdAtmya or ananyatva, presupposes having
> two entities between whom a sambandha is possible.
> > This bridge between kAraNa kArya not required really when we realize
> the 'sbustance' in two different words is ekaM eva adviteeyaM. ekaM sat
> viprA bahudA vadanti..I call 'neeru' you call it 'taNNi', someone else
> call it ' paani' call it by any name the essence is H2O only nothing
> else. mruttiketyeva satyaM :-)
> Ultimately, no point getting attached to words and concepts like kArya,
> kAraNa, jIva, jagat, Ishavara, avidyA, mAya, satyam, Sankara said this,
> vidyAraNya said that, etc - because Brahman is beyond all these, and we
> have to necessarily drop every blessed thing in order to know that which is
> beyond knowledge.
> > again absolutely right prabhuji...I am in full agreement with you. Why
> we have to be so fussy in insisting jeeva is the brahma but jagat is
> mithya etc. when brahman is beyond jeeva, jagat & Ishwara !!
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list