[Advaita-l] How can the reality of brahman be proven?

[V Subrahmanian]

On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Kalyan <kalyan_kg at yahoo.com> wrote:

> If I can sum up your argument, it goes like this -
>
> I define brahman as existence. Therefore brahman must exist.
>
> //The absurdity of the argument speaks for itself.//
>

The absurdity of the above is obvious. I do not define Brahman as
existence; it is the Veda that does that. Satyam Jnanam Anantam Brahma is
the Taittiriya definition. Satyam is Sat, Existence. If this is agreed to
start with, no absurdity will be encountered.

vs

>
>