[Advaita-l] How can the reality of brahman be proven?
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Fri Apr 6 07:07:35 EDT 2018
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Kalyan <kalyan_kg at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If I can sum up your argument, it goes like this -
> I define brahman as existence. Therefore brahman must exist.
> //The absurdity of the argument speaks for itself.//
The absurdity of the above is obvious. I do not define Brahman as
existence; it is the Veda that does that. Satyam Jnanam Anantam Brahma is
the Taittiriya definition. Satyam is Sat, Existence. If this is agreed to
start with, no absurdity will be encountered.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list