[Advaita-l] Advaita-l Digest, Vol 173, Issue 1

[Dr. K. Shankar]

Pl. can someone explain Brahmagnavali and Atmashatakam?

On Sun, 2 Dec 2018 at 6:49 AM, <advaita-l-request at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
wrote:

> Send Advaita-l mailing list submissions to
>         advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         advaita-l-request at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         advaita-l-owner at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Advaita-l digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: svarupa lakShaNa and taTastha lakShaNa of brahma.
>       (sreenivasa murthy)
>    2. Re: svarupa lakShaNa and taTastha lakShaNa of brahma.
>       (R Krishnamoorthy)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 14:53:52 +0000 (UTC)
> From: sreenivasa murthy <narayana145 at yahoo.co.in>
> To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
>         <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] svarupa lakShaNa and taTastha lakShaNa of
>         brahma.
> Message-ID: <1608575718.278258.1543676032214 at mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>  Dear friends, Is  it  not  much  more  profittable  and  beneficial
>  if  one  cognizes  or  realizes  his  own  nijasvarupalakShaNa
> before  entering  into  discussions  about  svarUpalakshana
> and  tatasthalakshana  of  brahman  who  is  unknown?
> How  do  the  readers  feel  about  it?With respectful
> namaskars,Sreenivasa Murthy.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 20:27:56 +0530
> From: R Krishnamoorthy <srirudra at gmail.com>
> To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
>         <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] svarupa lakShaNa and taTastha lakShaNa of
>         brahma.
> Message-ID: <10B4433C-2AAD-499A-89EA-805104434C91 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=utf-8
>
> Dears
> Both mean the same.Sath is the root for Sathyam.Chith is the basis for
> jnanam.Anandam is anandam.There is no equivalent for the word anandam in
> English.
> Brahman is sath chith And anandam .
> R.Krishnamoorthy.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 30-Nov-2018, at 1:20 AM, Durga Prasad Janaswamy via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hari Om,
> >
> > सत्यम् ज्ञानम्  अनन्तम्  are स्वरुप लक्षण of ब्रह्म.  They are not तटस्थ
> > लक्षण of ब्रह्म.
> > satyam j~nAnam  anantam  are svarupa lakShaNa of brahma.  They are not
> > taTastha lakShaNa of brahma.
> >
> > How about सत् चित् आनन्द ?
> > How about sat chit Ananda ?
> >
> > regards
> > -- durga
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Advaita-l Digest, Vol 173, Issue 1
> *****************************************
>