[Advaita-l] 'iti' in the vAcArambhaNa shruti

[Venkatraghavan S]

Namaste,
None taken. In my view, absolutely so. vikAro nAmadheyam, kAraNam ityeva
satyam corresponds to the second definition of mithyAtva.
Regards,
Venkatraghavan


On 15 Feb 2018 14:49, "H S Chandramouli" <hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:

Namaste.
>
>
>
> Reg  << I am unable to understand why 6-4 is more difficult to establish
> mithyAtva, or how this is more akin to milk-curds analogy. The use of 'iti'
> to say that the effect is real only as the cause is true in both places in
> my opinion.>>,
>
>
>
> I absolutely agree with the second sentence. But at this stage I need a
> clarification before I answer the other question. Is it your contention
> that this represents mithyatva? No offence meant. Just a straightforward
> doubt. In my view, it does not.
>
>
>
>  Regards
>
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#m_-2267380582639459185_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>