[Advaita-l] 'iti' in the vAcArambhaNa shruti

[H S Chandramouli]

Namste.

I have no doubt about my understanding. Since you have given a specific
reference, I will have a look and revert back.

Regards

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste,
> None taken. In my view, absolutely so. vikAro nAmadheyam, kAraNam ityeva
> satyam corresponds to the second definition of mithyAtva.
> Regards,
> Venkatraghavan
>
>
> On 15 Feb 2018 14:49, "H S Chandramouli" <hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Namaste.
>>
>>
>>
>> Reg  << I am unable to understand why 6-4 is more difficult to establish
>> mithyAtva, or how this is more akin to milk-curds analogy. The use of 'iti'
>> to say that the effect is real only as the cause is true in both places in
>> my opinion.>>,
>>
>>
>>
>> I absolutely agree with the second sentence. But at this stage I need a
>> clarification before I answer the other question. Is it your contention
>> that this represents mithyatva? No offence meant. Just a straightforward
>> doubt. In my view, it does not.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Regards
>>
>>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_-1981856200052848197_m_-2267380582639459185_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
>