[Advaita-l] Swami Nischalananda Saraswathi replies to ISKCON's claims of Advaita being a Mayavadi
Srinath Vedagarbha
svedagarbha at gmail.com
Mon Jul 16 10:17:22 EDT 2018
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:45 PM V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Srinath ji,
>
> What you have said below is forgetting that Advaita holds that shakti as
> mithya; not having an existence of its own. So, Brahman is always
> nirvishesha. The Shakti is assumed by Vedanta solely for the purpose of
> explaining the perceived duality, samsara, bandha, moksha. It is a case of
> 'adhyaropa' by the shaastra. Its apavada is also done by the shastra
> itself. So, when it is said 'shakti sahita' , that shakti is superimposed
> by the shastra on Brahman.
>
The term 'sahita' is same meaning as 'superimposed' ; is beyond anybody'
comprehension! No sane person will say 'sarpa-sahita rajju' instead of
'sarpArOpita-rajju' for snake over rope illusion.
> When it is said 'mayaa adhyakshena prakriti suuyate...', the
> 'adhyakshatva' is passive presence of Brahman as mere consciousness and no
> active role is admitted in advaita. 'svabhaavastu pravartate.' Brahman is
> incapable of doing anything for the Upanishad teaches it has no prana, no
> manas, no body, etc. It is solely dependent on that prakriti for creation,
> etc. All the ananta kalyana gunas assumed in Brahman are a contribution of
> that shakti. This can be inferred from the fact that not a single of that
> ananta gunas is unrelated to either jagat or jiva. Thus, all the ananta
> gunas in Brahman are jagat-jiva dependent and not a single guna can be
> shown exclusively of Brahman.
>
> Amritabindu Upanishad:
>
> न निरोधो न चोत्पत्तिर्न बद्धो न च साधकः ।
> न मुमुक्षुर्न वै मुक्त इत्येषा परमार्थता ॥॥ cited by Gaudapada in the
> Mandukya Karika.
>
> There is no creation, no dissolution, none bound, no aspirant, none
> liberated. This is the absolute truth.
>
>>
>>
Such statement makes janmAdhyassya sUtra invalid and which makes own
school's commentator Shankra (on such sUtra) an ignorant!
No wonder Gaudapada did not care to write bhAshya on sUtra!
/sv
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list