[Advaita-l] Is Badarayana same as Vyasa?

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste.

I had given the reference in my earlier post, copied here again for ready
use.


Upadesha Sahasri, metric part, 16-67 is copied here.

 << श्रद्धाभक्ती पुरस्कृत्य हित्वा सर्वमनार्जवम् I

वेदान्तस्यैव तत्वार्थे व्यास्स्याभिमतौ तथा II >>

<< shraddhAbhaktI puraskRRitya hitvA sarvamanArjavam I

vedAntasyaiva  tatvArthe vyAssyAbhimatau tathA II >>

Regards


On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 3:13 PM, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:08 PM, H S Chandramouli via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Sri Bhaskar Ji,
>>
>>
>> I don’t think that is what Sri SSS has said. While dismissing the surmises
>> of the western scholars, this is exactly what he has dismissed. From what
>> I
>> understand of Sri SSS, what he has said is that while there is no mention
>> of the identity as between Sri Badarayana and Sri Vyasa in the Bhashya
>> itself, based on the reference in Upadesha Sahasri there can be no
>> objection to concluding that, according to Sri Bhagavatpada, they (krishna
>> dvaipAyana vyAsa or bhArata kara vyAsa and sUtrakAra bAdarAyaNa )  are one
>> and the same. This is my reading of the text by Sri SSS.
>>
>
> Could you please give the Upadesha Sahasri references if any that you
> could give without much effort?
>
> Thanks
> vs
>
>>
>> Regards
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>
>