[Advaita-l] धर्म हिंसा तथैव च: is fake.

[स्मार्त्त कुवँर बिपिन चौहान]

जय श्रीराम।

आपके सहयोग का हार्दिक धन्यवाद।
राम कृपा है।
श्री राम जय राम जय जय राम।
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 14:54, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 1:44 PM स्मार्त्त कुवँर बिपिन चौहान <
> bipinchauhan7 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A person quotes this. “अहिंसा परमो धर्मः” -non violence is religions
>> virtue, in times of peace.. “धर्म हिंसा तथैव च:” -violence too is virtue,
>> in times to protect religion..
>> *Shivaji *practiced whats is preached in Bhagavad Gita..
>>
>
> We have Shankaracharya's bhashya, through the words of the opponent, an
> endorsement of the above:  2.10:
>
> अत्र केचिदाहुः — सर्वकर्मसंन्यासपूर्वकादात्मज्ञाननिष्ठामात्रादेव केवलात्
> कैवल्यं न प्राप्यत एव । किं तर्हि ? अग्निहोत्रादिश्रौतस्मार्तकर्मसहितात्
> ज्ञानात् कैवल्यप्राप्तिरिति सर्वासु गीतासु निश्चितोऽर्थ इति । ज्ञापकं च
> आहुरस्यार्थस्य — ‘अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं सङ्ग्रामं न करिष्यसि’ (भ. गी.
> २ । ३३)
> <http://advaitasharada.sringeri.net/display/bhashya/Gita?page=2&id=BG_C02_V33&hl=%E0%A4%85%E0%A4%A5%20%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%82%20%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%82%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%99%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%82%20%E0%A4%A8%20%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%B7%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BF>
>  ‘कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते’ (भ. गी. २ । ४७)
> <http://advaitasharada.sringeri.net/display/bhashya/Gita?page=2&id=BG_C02_V47&hl=%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%A3%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A5%87%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%87>
>  ‘कुरु कर्मैव तस्मात्त्वम्’ (भ. गी. ४ । १५)
> <http://advaitasharada.sringeri.net/display/bhashya/Gita?page=4&id=BG_C04_V15&hl=%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%81%20%E0%A4%95%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%88%E0%A4%B5%20%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%AE%E0%A5%8D>
>  इत्यादि । हिंसादियुक्तत्वात् वैदिकं कर्म अधर्माय इतीयमप्याशङ्का न
> कार्या । कथम् ? क्षात्रं कर्म युद्धलक्षणं गुरुभ्रातृपुत्रादि
> हिंसालक्षणमत्यन्तं क्रूरमपि स्वधर्म इति कृत्वा न अधर्माय ; तदकरणे च ‘ततः
> स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि’ (भ. गी. २ । ३३)
> <http://advaitasharada.sringeri.net/display/bhashya/Gita?page=2&id=BG_C02_V33&hl=%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%83%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%82%20%E0%A4%95%E0%A5%80%E0%A4%B0%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%A4%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%82%20%E0%A4%9A%20%E0%A4%B9%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%20%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AA%E0%A4%AE%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%AA%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%BF> इति
> ब्रुवता यावज्जीवादिश्रुतिचोदितानां पश्वादिहिंसालक्षणानां च कर्मणां
> प्रागेव नाधर्मत्वमिति सुनिश्चितमुक्तं भवति — इति ॥
>
> Swami Gambhirananda's translation:
>
>  The well-ascertained conclusion of the whole of the Gita is that
> Liberation is attained through Knowledge associated with rites and duties
> like Agnihotra etc. prescribed in the Vedas and the Smrtis. And as an
> indication of this point of view they ote (the verses): 'On the other hand,
> if you will not fight this righteous (battle)' (33); 'Your right is for
> action (rites and duties) alone' (47); 'Therefore you undertake action
> (rites and duties) itself' (4.15), etc. Even this objection should not be
> raised that Vedic rites and duties lead to sin since they involve injury
> etc.'. Objection: How? Opponent: The duties of the Ksatriyas, charaterized
> by war, do not lead to sin when undertaken as one's duty, even though they
> are extremely cruel since they involve violence against elders, brothers,
> sons and others. And from the Lord's declaration that when they are not
> performed, 'then, forsaking your own duty and fame, you will incur sin'
> (33), it stands out as (His) clearly stated foregone conclusion that one's
> own duties prescribed in such texts as, '(One shall perform Agnihotra) as
> long as one lives' etc., and actions which involve crutely to animals etc.
> are not sinful.
>
> While Shankara refutes the basic proposition of the opponent: //Liberation
> is attained through Knowledge associated with rites and duties like
> Agnihotra etc. prescribed in the Vedas and the Smrtis.//   Shankara does
> not refute the other points stated by the opponent about cruelty, himsaa,
> occurring as part of carrying out as one's swardharma....is not adharma.
>
> So, please rest assured that the above position is perfectly in tune with
> the scripture.
>
> regards
> subbu
>
>> Shivajji’s raids on Portuguese indeed carried a deeper meaning.. Thanks,
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>