[Advaita-l] MOKSHA or MUKTI

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Sri Bhaskar Ji,



Reg  << Now the question is the sthita prajna or the Atmaikatva paripUrNa
jnAni while living in his current shareera (ofcourse the shareera due to
prArabdha)  could get vrutti-s like rAga-dvesha due to leftovers of avidyA
??  I don’t think in Geeta bhAshya where sthita prajnatvaM explained
comprehensively would throw any light about oscillation of sthita prajnn’s
mind due to avidyA lesha.  OTOH it has been said there : rasavarjaM
rasOpyasya, paraM drushvA nivartate, rAga-dveshaviyuktaistu
vishAnindriyaischaran…And this is what brAhmee sthitiH says bhagavAn.
Anyways, I am not debating your stand here, just expressing my doubt >>,



My understanding is as follows. True, sthita prajna is devoid of
rAga-dvesha. However if you were to include BMI also in avidyA lesha, then
indeed sthita prajna has it.



Regards

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:55 PM Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> << This state is in the primary sense what is termed mOksha or kaivalya
> or vAishNavapada in advaita sidhanta  >>,
>
>
>
> In addition, the more familiar terms like jIvanmukta/sthitaprajna etc
> could be included.
>
>
>
> praNAms Sri ChandramouLi prabhuji
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Yes, that would be the more appropriate terms to define sadyO mukta.
> paramArtha jnani / Atmaikatva jnani  and resultant mukti.  This type of
> jnana & mukti  is -sva-hrudaya pratyaya ( no interval between these two as
> far as I am concerned) and no one should question it and doubt it says
> bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya.  And adds that to show is there is
> explanation about sthita prajna.  Now the question is the sthita prajna or
> the Atmaikatva paripUrNa jnAni while living in his current shareera
> (ofcourse the shareera due to prArabdha)   could get vrutti-s like
> rAga-dvesha due to leftovers of avidyA ??  I don’t think in Geeta bhAshya
> where sthita prajnatvaM explained comprehensively would throw any light
> about oscillation of sthita prajnn’s mind due to avidyA lesha.  OTOH it has
> been said there : rasavarjaM rasOpyasya, paraM drushvA nivartate,
> rAga-dveshaviyuktaistu vishAnindriyaischaran…And this is what brAhmee
> sthitiH says bhagavAn.  Anyways, I am not debating your stand here, just
> expressing my doubt.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>