[Advaita-l] Shankara's opinion about Sannyasa for a Kshatriya
Sudhanshu Shekhar
sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com
Wed Jun 5 07:55:26 EDT 2019
Bhaskar ji,
1. ☺️
2. So basically you are saying vidvat-sanyasa is post-moksha-sanyasa. I am
then with you that everyone is eligible for that. Whether that actually
happens to them is dependent on their prarabdha.
Sudhanshu.
On Wed 5 Jun, 2019, 15:41 Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> praNAms Sri Sudhanshu Shekhar prabhuji
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> 1. //BTW, justification like this cannot be said in the case of
> vyAkhyAnakAra-s works as they have differed drastically from mUla
> bhAshya.// ☺️ Are you sure ? What appears as "drastic difference" to
> you in the case of vyakhyanakara may be mere "elaboration" of the crisp
> mula in view of others.
>
>
> - Oh yes, infact that is the most popular view point with regard to
> the difference though vyakhyAnakAra-s themselves pitting each other in
> their works with below belt comments 😊 And the latest terminology
> introduced to patch up this differences is ‘prakriya bheda’, all roads are
> well and good as long as it leads to Rome…so says these experts. Well they
> have every right to have their own defenses who are we to question it ??
>
>
>
> 1. The basic problem is the fitting in of vidvat-sanyasa in the
> sequence mentioned in Gita Bhashya 5.12.
>
> > The sequence mentioned there is sAdhana mArga but the vidvat
> sannyasa is artha siddha or natural state of mukta it happens automatically
> and naturally since there is an abhAva of kartrutva. So, IMHO, no need to
> fit the mOkshAvastha in the sequence of sAdhana mArga since it is not at
> all an injunction during the post period of mOksha. It can be termed as
> ‘shrouta sanyAsa’ which automatically happens in jnAnanishTa.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list