[Advaita-l] No Parinama in Brahman says Shankara Bhagavatpada

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Hari Om Bhaskar Prabhu ji,

I have gone through the bhAshya.

Clay-pot requires space which is different from clay. Without that the
drishtAnta does not work. upAdhi-drishti and svarUpa-drishti are not
possible if there is singular changeless entity. How is upAdhi-drishti
possible? And even if possible, upAdhi-drishti itself connoted change.

यदि हि नाम रूप न व्याक्रियेते.. But on the contrary, if there is
manifestation of name-form, then changelessness is compromised.

Sudhanshu.







On Fri 28 Jun, 2019, 10:30 Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> PraNAms Sri Sudhanshu prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
>
> Let us go to the root of vyavahArika, pAramArthika, projection, anAditva,
> frame of reference etc - and that root thing is change. Everything is
> reduced to change and changeless.
>
> >  Have you checked the bruhadAraNyaka bhAshya ??  I checked it it is in
> 3.5.1 as I earlier mentioned.  The bhAshyakAra exactly addresses your issue
> here :  nAma rUpa upAdhi astitve 'ekemevAdviteeyaM neha nAnAsti kiMchana
> iti shrutayOH virudhyeran iti chet??  Na, parihrutatvAt mrudAdi
> drushtAntaischa...Please read this bhAshya bhAga fully to understand how
> brahman can be changeless despite there is change, bhAshyakAra clarifies
> how there is a difference between svarUpa drushti / upAdhi drushti.  Only
> the shapeless / changeless gold can change into ring, bangle etc.  is it
> not?? Only the mrut sAmAnya (the changeless) can appear as mrut vishesha
> like pinda, ghata etc. ( just like all colousr are there in plain white )
> For that matter, if you don’t have the change (nAma rUpa) you will not be
> able to understand / realize the 'changeless' (prajnAna ghana) svarUpa
> behind it.  bhAshyakAra exactly says this.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>