[Advaita-l] Whether darkness is bhava - Vivarana Prameya Samgraha of Shri Vidyaranya

Venkatesh Murthy vmurthy36 at gmail.com
Sat May 4 22:46:53 EDT 2019


Namaste

I also was saying the same thing. NAND of 5 lights. Darkness =
NAND(Light1,Light2,Light3,Light4,Light5). When even 1 light is switched off
the NAND value is 1. Darkness is present. All lights should be switched on
to make NAND value 0.

On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 1:47 AM Praveen R. Bhat via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Namaste Sudanshuji,
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 6:47 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > This is his argument which appears bizzare.
> >
> > Let darkness be A1-abhava AND  A2-abhava AND A3-abhava .........AND
> > An-abhava where n is last type of aloka. Like surya-aloka-abhava AND
> > deepak-aloka -abhava AND lamp-aloka-abhava upto nth type of aloka-abhava.
> >
> > If this is the premise then to remove darkness, we don't have to have the
> > sannindhana of A1 to An as claimed by V. There is a basic logic. ~(~A1
> and
> > ~A2 and ~An) = A1 or A2 or An... That is to say, the negation changes the
> > "and" to "or".
> >
> > To me, it appears that you have erred in interpreting sarvAlokAbhAva
> which
> should mean sarvAlokAnAm abhAvaH and not AlokAbhAvAnAm samUhaH. Thereby,
> what it should lead to is that:
> darkness is !(A1 &&A2 &&A3.... &&An) which is clearly present when any
> Aloka is absent and to take away darkness, all AlokAs necessarily need to
> be there. The truth-table is of a simple NAND.
>
> A1 A2 Darkness
> 0   0   1
> 0   1   1
> 1   0   1
> 1   1   0 (absence of darkness)
>
>
>
> > Thus, his statement that removal of sarva-aloka-abhava can only be
> achieved
> > by the sannidhana of sarva-aloka is incorrect. The removal of
> > sarva-aloka-abhava is by kinchit-aloka and not by sarva-aloka.
> >
> > So sannidhAna of sarvAloka is correct for darkness to go.
>
> Kind rgds,
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
> That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>


-- 
Regards

-Venkatesh


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list