[Advaita-l] Shabda-ajanya-vritti-vishayatva of tuchch

[Venkatraghavan S]

If it is tucCha, then we would have accepted that tucCha is also anumiti
viShaya. Hence I said it is only the pada which is the viShaya of such a
vRtti not an akhaNDa padArtha denoted by the tucCha pada.



On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, 12:51 Sudhanshu Shekhar, <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Venkataraghavan ji,
>
> तुच्छं न क्षणिकम्, अकारणत्वात्, ब्रह्मवत्।
>
> Here paksha is tuchcha, अक्षणिकत्व is sAdhya.
>
> How can we hold that paksha is tuchcha shabda?
>
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Dec, 2021, 11:43 am Venkatraghavan S, <agnimile at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Sudhanshu ji,
>> The paksha of any anumAna is a viShaya of the anumiti.
>>
>> We hold that the paksha here is the shabda tucCha. They hold that the
>> paksha is the tucCha itself. So for them, the tucCha itself is
>> anumiti-viShaya.
>>
>> Regards
>> Venkatraghavan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Dec 2021, 11:30 Sudhanshu Shekhar, <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Venkataraghavan ji,
>>>
>>> तुच्छं न क्षणिकम्, अकारणत्वात्, ब्रह्मवत्।
>>>
>>> Is shasha-vishANa an object of vritti janya by this anumAna?
>>>
>>> Laghuchandrika makes that statement for
>>> sat-tAdAtmya-asat-tAdAtmya-anyataravatva (a little later). In this context
>>> of anumAna-vritti-janya-vishayatva, it does not make that statement. That's
>>> why I got confused.
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>