[Advaita-l] (no subject)

[Praveen R. Bhat]

#correction: raise an objection
Kind rgds,
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */


On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:39 PM Praveen R. Bhat <bhatpraveen at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:29 PM H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> There is never any doubt regarding the satyatva of kArya. The conviction
>> is firm and total. There is neither any increase nor any decrease in the
>> conviction.
>>
> Not true. vAsanAs growing, the conviction becomes firmer. One need not use
> buddhi to have such buddhi. It's a notion, unknowingly happening. That is
> why it is called avidyA-granthi. It becomes stronger with more and more
> karma.
>
>
>> So how does the question of cyclical nature arise? It could be considered
>> linear. Yes. That is  a reasoning. But cyclical? No I think.
>>
>>> Well, whatever helps you. I like to see the triad mentioned as cyclical,
> due to the above reasoning. The discussion on this aspect is meaningless
> as I can raise a object on its linear nature by asking why kAma and karma
> recur!
>
> Kind rgds,
> --Praveen R. Bhat
> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
> That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
>
>>