[Advaita-l] ​Re: [advaitin] A talk on avidyA by Manjushree

[Michael Chandra Cohen]

Jaishankar ji, I will respond - please be patient.

Kindly consider the well presented reply to your original objection from
another source:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nOxJ6CDZUEfZ2Kol2ncRHHjMT1z3UbA9/view

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 8:30 AM Jaishankar Narayanan via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Dear Raja Krishnamurti ji,
>
> Mithya / Asat / Anrtam are all synonymous and used a ontological terms.
> That means - they do not signify an object (vastu) but signify the reality
> status of an object. So the right statement is 'Maya is mithya / Asat /
> Anrtam' as Maya is not of the same order of reality as Brahman and is only
> in vyavahaara. Maya is used to explain away the creation and the apparent
> creatorship of Brahman.
>
> with love and prayers,
> Jaishankar
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 9:19 PM Raja Krishnamurti via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > Hari Om, Jaishankar ji, for this beautiful explanation of mithya and
> Maya.
> > Only one question. Is Maya the cause for mithya?
> > With great regards,
> > Raja Krishnamurti
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>