[Advaita-l] [advaitin] SSSS on the controversy between mulav7idya and abhavarupa - directly and simply explained as per SSSS

[Bhaskar YR]

praNAms
Hare Krishna

Then, what would the non-vyakhyanakara's meaning be for the Upanishadic term?


Ø     If at all some one wants to accommodate the term ‘mUlAvidyA’ it should be jnAnAbhAva only as per Sri SSS.  He never ever accepted something like bhAvarUpa avidyA which is categorically said as upAdAna kAraNa for the adhyAsa by vyAkhyAnakAra-s.  The fourth alien entity called mulAvidyA, which is the mother of all three definitions/types of avidyA and at the same time entirely different from jnAnAbhAva, vipareeta grahaNa, saMshaya has no place in Shuddha shankara Vedanta he reiterates this point everywhere.

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar