[Advaita-l] [advaitin] nAma-rUpa and nAma-rUpa-bIja

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Namaste Chandramouli ji.

Not sure if I am missing out on that. But the AvaraNa aspect of avidyA
> seems to be missing. That is in my view the most important aspect because
> for aparOksha jnAna, nAsha of the AvaraNa is the only way.
>

Why do you feel so? What exactly is AvarNa? It is nothing but
avidyA-chit-sambandha and it refers to the yogyatA of AvaraNa-kritya.
.......अस्ति प्रकाशत इत्येतद्व्यवहाराभावो वा आवरणकृत्यम् । आवरणं च
#तद्योग्यता #अज्ञानसंबन्धरूपा.

Equating avidyA to nAma-rUpa-bIja/mAyA/avyAkrita does not militate against
the AvaraNa-shakti of avidyA.

I am unable to understand the reason for your remarks.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.