[Advaita-l] [advaitin] nAma-rUpa and nAma-rUpa-bIja

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Sudhanshu Ji,

No no. I am not suggesting  equating avidyA to
nAma-rUpa-bIja/mAyA/avyAkrita  militates against the AvaraNa-shakti of
avidyA.

I only thought AvaraNa-shakti of avidyA could also have been specifically
included. That is all.

Regards

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:35 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Chandramouli ji.
>
> Not sure if I am missing out on that. But the AvaraNa aspect of avidyA
>> seems to be missing. That is in my view the most important aspect because
>> for aparOksha jnAna, nAsha of the AvaraNa is the only way.
>>
>
> Why do you feel so? What exactly is AvarNa? It is nothing but
> avidyA-chit-sambandha and it refers to the yogyatA of AvaraNa-kritya.
> .......अस्ति प्रकाशत इत्येतद्व्यवहाराभावो वा आवरणकृत्यम् । आवरणं च
> #तद्योग्यता #अज्ञानसंबन्धरूपा.
>
> Equating avidyA to nAma-rUpa-bIja/mAyA/avyAkrita does not militate against
> the AvaraNa-shakti of avidyA.
>
> I am unable to understand the reason for your remarks.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
>
>
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>