[Advaita-l] [advaitin] nAma-rUpa and nAma-rUpa-bIja

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste.

If you feel it is not called for, just ignore my comments.

Regards

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:39 PM H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Sudhanshu Ji,
>
> No no. I am not suggesting  equating avidyA to
> nAma-rUpa-bIja/mAyA/avyAkrita  militates against the AvaraNa-shakti of
> avidyA.
>
> I only thought AvaraNa-shakti of avidyA could also have been specifically
> included. That is all.
>
> Regards
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 9:35 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <
> sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Chandramouli ji.
>>
>> Not sure if I am missing out on that. But the AvaraNa aspect of avidyA
>>> seems to be missing. That is in my view the most important aspect because
>>> for aparOksha jnAna, nAsha of the AvaraNa is the only way.
>>>
>>
>> Why do you feel so? What exactly is AvarNa? It is nothing but
>> avidyA-chit-sambandha and it refers to the yogyatA of AvaraNa-kritya.
>> .......अस्ति प्रकाशत इत्येतद्व्यवहाराभावो वा आवरणकृत्यम् । आवरणं च
>> #तद्योग्यता #अज्ञानसंबन्धरूपा.
>>
>> Equating avidyA to nAma-rUpa-bIja/mAyA/avyAkrita does not militate
>> against the AvaraNa-shakti of avidyA.
>>
>> I am unable to understand the reason for your remarks.
>>
>> Regards.
>> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
>>
>>
>>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Virus-free.www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_4969377670715051162_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>