[Advaita-l] Bhagavan Rama

Kaushik Chevendra chevendrakaushik at gmail.com
Thu Oct 10 10:38:08 EDT 2024


Namaste raghav ji.

Namaste Kaushik
> I shall stop with this but the uttara kANDa constitutes a far weaker
> pramANa for establishing Rama's divinity compared to Valmiki Ramayana.


I only wanted to point out that all sampradayas and acharyas admit it as
authentic. I do consider it authentic for that reason.

>
So Rama may not have *needed* reminding (and I did not say he needed it )
> but  the narrative there clearly shows Rama (as though) said he only knows
> himself as Dasharatha's son and Brahman and others choose to remind him
> saying "How do you not recognize yourself to be the foremost of the Gods
> etc".
> So the reminding did happen though it may have been superfluous.


I absolutely agree with you on this. It did happen, I only pointed out that
the lord never looses his cognitive power as isvara so it was a mere Leela.
My post was only to refute the arguments that “Rama was a mere mortal”. As
I have been coming across these statements very regularly.


Namo Narayana





>
> I shall stop with this.
>
> Om
> Raghav


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list