[Advaita-l] anumAna-pramANa

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Namaste Chandramouli ji.


> I thought it is clear by the context that when agni is mentioned as above,
> it meant agni jnana and not agni as a vastu.
>

agni-jnAna is a jnAna which has agni as the vishaya. vyApti-jnAna, which is
anumiti-karaNa, is a jnAna which has vyApti as the vishaya.

If you say that agni-jnAna is vyApti-jnAna, it implies that agni is vyApti,
which is incorrect.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.