[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Kilogram not yet concluded after all

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Namaste Michael ji.

I asked for the counter-evidence not gratuitously but for a good reason.

Anyway, let it be.

1. MUlAvidyA is mithyA. adhyasta and mithyA are same. If x is mithyA, x is
adhyasta.

2. There are two adhyAsa. KAraNa-adhyAsa and kArya-adhyAsa. The adhyAsa
wherein avidyA is adhyasta is called kAraNa-adhyAsa. The same is well
mentioned in all texts.

You are seeking for evidence where it is said that avidyA is adhyasta. It
is in every text everywhere. It is the very fundamental of Advaita.

That is why I was curious that how even this doubt arose that avidyA cannot
be adhyasta.

In any case, please let me know the texts which are acceptable to you as
sufficient evidence.

Regards.