[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Kilogram not yet concluded after all

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

>
> Namaste Ananta Chaitanya ji.

I wonder if all these Qs raised against mUlAvidyA being kAraNa occur to SSS
> followers regarding mAyA also. Whatever resolution works there should work
> for avidyA also, because in sampradAya, both are same, albeit at vyaShTi
> and samaShTi level.  Any thoughts?
>

I am not sure whether they consider mAyA to be bhAva or abhAva or whether
they are unable to say as to whether it is bhAva or abhAva.

avidyA they certainly consider as abhAva. In fact, if I remember correctly,
in sugama, SSSS ji has said avidyA to be jnAna- prAk-abhAva.

So, avidyA would be nirvachanIya for them, but mAyA would be anirvachanIya.


Unless ofcourse, they consider Maya also to be abhAvarUpa or sadrUpa, same
> as brahman!! Nothing is likely to surprise me any more after some funny
> revelations in this thread.
>

Problem is that they do not define the terms rigorously. So, vagueness
comes.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.

>