[Advaita-l] Can the self be called anirvachaniya?

[Bhaskar YR]

case with sense-perception, still it is possible to teach Brahman through the shabda Pramana

praNAms 
Hare Krishna

And bhAshyakAra clarifies how the shAstra can explain brahman in samanvayAdhikaraNa.  Here the question is if brahman is not an object of any action, then it cannot be said that shAstra is the means of knowing it.  For the vedAnti says : not so, for the shAstra purports to wipe off the distinction superimposed on brahman by avidyA.  The shAstra does not indeed propose to teach brahman as such and such an object, but it teaches brahman as no object at all.  

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar