[Advaita-l] Can the self be called anirvachaniya?

[V Subrahmanian]

On Wed, Sep 25, 2024 at 3:42 PM Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at hitachienergy.com>
wrote:

> case with sense-perception, still it is possible to teach Brahman through
> the shabda Pramana
>
> praNAms
> Hare Krishna
>
> And bhAshyakAra clarifies how the shAstra can explain brahman in
> samanvayAdhikaraNa.  Here the question is if brahman is not an object of
> any action, then it cannot be said that shAstra is the means of knowing
> it.  For the vedAnti says : not so, for the shAstra purports to wipe off
> the distinction superimposed on brahman by avidyA.  The shAstra does not
> indeed propose to teach brahman as such and such an object, but it teaches
> brahman as no object at all.


Yes, indeed, Bhaskar ji.

regards

>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>