Three schools of thought
Jaldhar H. Vyas
jaldhar at BRAINCELLS.COM
Mon Nov 25 13:18:14 CST 1996
> From: Shashikanth Hosur <shashi at KBSSUN1.TAMU.EDU>
> Don't make assumptions.
Ok, I won't. I will however infer based on whatever facts are in my
posession.
> How do u know that they are against advaita.
I look at what acharyas in the Advaita parampara have said, and then what
these others have said and see if they match. If they don't they are
against Advaita.
> Did u practise it or complete understand before u made the above
statement?
I don't completewly understand brownian motion but I know how to make a cup
of tea. :-) Anumana (logic, inference) is a valid means of cognition
according to Advaita. We should make as much use of it as possible.
> Could u specify who are these people who made mistakes.
Anyone who disagrees with me. :-) No, seriously one example would be those
who say mental renunciation is enough.
--
Jaldhar H. Vyas [jaldhar at braincells.com] And the men .-_|\ who hold
Consolidated Braincells Inc. / \
http://www.braincells.com/jaldhar/ -)~~~~~~~~ Perth->*.--._/ o-
"Witty quote" - Dead Guy /\/\/\ _ _ ___ _ _ Amboy v McQ!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list