Dvaita and Sophistry - Part 2(Reality and Unreality)

[kalyan chakravarthy]

Namaskaaram,

> > How do you accept a definition which seriously falls short of explaining
>all
> > aspects?
>
>Short answer: I don't.  You haven't even come close to demonstrating that
>I do.

These are your own statements -

1. That's fine.  Even so, it suffices to show that difference is a quality,
which was the point you questioned.

2.Try the dictionary, which defines difference as "the quality of being
unlike or dissimilar," etc.

Why would suggest the dictionary, unless you yourself accept its definition?

Best Regards
Kalyan





>From: Shrisha Rao <shrao at NYX.NET>
>Reply-To: List for advaita vedanta as taught by Shri Shankara
><ADVAITA-L at LISTS.ADVAITA-VEDANTA.ORG>
>To: ADVAITA-L at LISTS.ADVAITA-VEDANTA.ORG
>Subject: Re: Dvaita and Sophistry - Part 2(Reality and Unreality)
>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:16:54 -0700
>
>On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, kalyan chakravarthy wrote:
>
> > >That's fine.  Even so, it suffices to show that difference is a
>quality,
> > >which was the point you questioned.
> >
> > How do you accept a definition which seriously falls short of explaining
>all
> > aspects?
>
>Short answer: I don't.  You haven't even come close to demonstrating that
>I do.
>
>Regards,
>
>Shrisha Rao
>
> > Kalyan


_________________________________________________________________
Call US for just Rs. 5. http://www.msn.co.in/webtelephony/ Get a phone card