[Advaita-l] A reference to 'jIvAshritA avidyA'

[Ravisankar Mayavaram]

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Anand Hudli <anandhudli at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> avidyA. Again, avidyA is said to have Brahman as its locus, only from
> an empirical point of view. avidyA is anirvachanIyA which means it is
> not really existent but
> appears to be so. So there is no danger of introducing a duality of
> Brahman and avidyA.
>
>
namaste Anandji

You have used the phrase "really not existent" - I think twice so far in
this thread. To me, that sounds like a translation of "asat" and not
"mithya.". Can you please clarify?

dhanyavaadaH
Ravi