[Advaita-l] Advaiti Response to this report?

[श्रीमल्ललितालालितः]

*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com/>
lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*



On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:03, Venkata sriram P <venkatasriramp at yahoo.in>wrote:

> For whom, it is shubha tithi, shubha nakshatra, shubha yoga, shubha
> karana, khara nama
> samvatsara, pushya masa? Certainly not for brahmavit.  When the knot of
> ignorance has
> been removed, one is in one's swa-swarupa sthiti, that state is described
> as "na tatra suryo bhAti na tatra chandra tArakam".   Whereas, the origin
> of kalachakra is from chandra & tara.
>

You just fail to understand that the problem is not with brahmavit. People
are arguing about brahma-viGYAna. Which type of brahma-viGYAna, advaitin's
version or dvaitins', is correct - is the question.


> I think, before studying all the so-called high sounding books, people who
> are arguing about advaita, should undergo the study of advaitic primer
> "Dakshinamurty Stotra"
> to have basic understanding of what Advaita is.
>

Primers are not enough is also widely accepted.