[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa vR^itti?

H S Chandramouli hschandramouli at gmail.com
Sun Aug 9 05:44:15 CDT 2015


I am clarifying. There is no intention to restart the discussion on the
topic. Sent only for information and use as considered fit.

Regards

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 3:58 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Sri Sadananda Ji,
>
> Though the subject is closed, since you had mentioned earlier that you
> were following the talks on Vichara Sagara by Swami Paramarthananda , I
> could not resist the temptation to draw your attention to the reference
> made in the latest talk delivered by Swami Paramarthananda yesterday ( on
> 08 August ) concerning Akhandakara Vritti as well as contribution of
> Vedanta Paribhasha to Vichara Sagara. The talk can be accessed at the link
> << http://www.mediafire.com/download/os2dsmje1i6528k/VS-158-8thAug15.mp3
> >> .
>
> Pranams and Regards
>
> Chandramouli
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:30 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Vichara Sagara itself follows the definitions as given in Vedanta
>> Paribhasha. Sri Swami Paramarthananda Ji himself mentions this in his
>> current lectures , though I do not remember off hand the specific talk in
>> which he has mentioned as such. Perhaps one of the other members who are
>> following the talks could furnish this info. I will certainly furnish other
>> references perhaps a little later as I am going out of town and wont be
>> having access to my mails for a few days.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
>> Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:05 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa
>> vR^itti?
>> To: H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> Can you give me some references. Thanks
>> Sada
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> On Tue, 7/28/15, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa
>> vR^itti?
>>  To: "kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
>>  Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2015, 2:30 AM
>>
>>  I may also
>>  add that vedantic literature generally adopt the terms
>>  antahkarana vritti and avidya vritti as defined in Vedanta
>>  Paribhasha and Advaita Sidhi.
>>  Regards
>>  On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at
>>  11:42 AM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>  Sri Sadananda Ji,
>>  Basically the discussion so far
>>  pertained to what is presented in Vedanta Paribhasha and
>>  Advaita Sidhi. Very different from what you have considered
>>  here. I may be wrong.
>>  Pranams and Regards
>>  Chandramouli
>>  On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:15 AM,
>>  kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
>>  wrote:
>>  PraNAms
>>
>>
>>
>>  Just for some thought,  but not to confuse.
>>
>>
>>
>>  There are several aspects involved - pramaa vs bhramaa,
>>  smRiti and perception, and whether smRiti comes under
>>  separate pramaana. Anandaji also brought in - the internal
>>  perceptions - such as emotions- anger, happiness, or certain
>>  moods of the mind.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Looking from a rational point - The perception for the first
>>  time (I think V. Advaita - classifies as indeterminate - not
>>  sure about tarkikaas) there is no role  of smRiti. and no
>>  jaati also here. When a child sees a cow for the first time,
>>  a white cow, and mother says - my dear this is a cow- now
>>  the cognition of cow and knowledge of the cognition as cow,
>>  as supported by aapta vaakya follows - otherwise just
>>  cognition of an object without a name.  Here pramaa and
>>  pramaata are involved at antaHkarana level. From my point,
>>  all cognitions are attributive in the sense that senses can
>>  only gather (reflective) attributes of the object perceived
>>  since original attributes are inseparable from their locus -
>>  and vishaya - the cow remains fortunately outside!
>>
>>
>>
>>  The first cognition forms a memory sometimes being referred
>>  to as samskaara or vaasaana, hence part of kaaraNa shareera
>>  - this may be called as avidyaa vRitti.
>>
>>
>>
>>  When the child sees another cow which is black, and the
>>  mother says this is also cow, - cognition, recognition as
>>  well as instincts of jaati are coming into play.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Hence even in perception for the second time on - smRiti is
>>  coming into picture in recognition part. Hence perception
>>  involves both cognition and recognition to some extent or
>>  memory is playing a role in the knowledge. Hence avidhyaa
>>  vRitti or vaasana samskaara coming in the recognition
>>  process and not a cognitive level.Hence we have both
>>  antaHkarana vRitti and avidyaa vRitti due to vaasanaas or
>>  samskaara or memory.
>>
>>
>>
>>  In the sRiti alone without cognition - as someone
>>  remembering a cow - then there is no cognition but only
>>  internal perception - if we call this as perception.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Bhranti comes when the cognition is incomplete (since
>>  cognition is mostly attributive and attributives are
>>  incomplete due to absence of required secondary conditions
>>  such as light etc) and smRitti say snake while seeing a
>>  rope.
>>
>>
>>
>>  smRiti is some have classified as antaHkarana vRitti while
>>  some others as avidya or kaarNa shareera vRitit.
>>
>>
>>
>>  With jaati only the general attribute say cowness of the cow
>>  comes into picture - this happens only after second perhaps
>>  reinforced cognition-recognition cycle.
>>
>>
>>
>>  Hari Om!
>>
>>  Sadananda
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  --------------------------------------------
>>
>>  On Mon, 7/27/15, H S Chandramouli via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
>>  wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>   Subject: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA
>>  vR^itti as against     antaHkaraNa     vR^itti?
>>
>>   To: "Anand Hudli" <anandhudli at hotmail.com>,
>>  "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
>>
>>   Date: Monday, July 27, 2015, 11:32 PM
>>
>>
>>
>>   Dear  Sri Anand Ji,
>>
>>
>>
>>   Is not sopadika bhranti (
>>
>>   सोपाधिक भ्रान्ति )
>>  considered
>>
>>   avidya vritti ,
>>
>>   even though it can be
>>
>>   classified as objective knowledge ? Please clarify.
>>
>>
>>
>>   Regards and Pranams
>>
>>
>>
>>   On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:10
>>
>>   PM, Anand Hudli via Advaita-l <
>>
>>   advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
>>
>>   wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>   > An attempt to
>>
>>   answer some questions.
>>
>>   > The difference
>>
>>   between objective knowledge and subjective knowledge
>>  lies
>>
>>   in
>>
>>   > the capability of the former type of
>>
>>   knowledge to be *directly*
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   (aparokSheNa) conveyed or used in dealings (vyavahAra)
>>  with
>>
>>   people other
>>
>>   > than the person who has
>>
>>   this knowledge. For example, if you see a pot, you
>>
>>   > may point it out to others, "this is
>>
>>   a pot", and they too will have the
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   same direct perception of the pot. On the other hand, if
>>  you
>>
>>   feel happy,
>>
>>   > you cannot *directly*
>>
>>   convey this feeling to me. There is no way for me to
>>
>>   > *directly* feel what you are feeling. You
>>
>>   may express your feeling with
>>
>>   > some act,
>>
>>   words, etc. that allows me to understand your feeling,
>>  but
>>
>>   this
>>
>>   > only gives me an *indirect*
>>
>>   knowledge. Coming to illusions such as a
>>
>>   > silver-nacre, the advaitasiddhi holds that
>>
>>   two cognitions are involved
>>
>>   > here. In
>>
>>   the (erroneous) cognition, "this is silver",
>>  the
>>
>>   "this" (idam)
>>
>>   > part is
>>
>>   objective, but the "silver" (rajatam) part is
>>
>>   subjective. Why? When
>>
>>   > a person seeing
>>
>>   illusory silver says, "this is silver",
>>  another
>>
>>   person in
>>
>>   > the vicinity will certainly
>>
>>   see some object as the first person did, but
>>
>>   > he/she may not see the object as silver.
>>
>>   It is possible the second person
>>
>>   > is not
>>
>>   affected by the illusion, and may, in fact, see the
>>  nacre,
>>
>>   not
>>
>>   > silver. So the agreement between
>>
>>   the first person and the second person is
>>
>>   > that there is "something" out
>>
>>   there. The knowledge of "something" is
>>
>>   > objective and is common to both persons.
>>
>>   However, the knowledge of "silver"
>>
>>   > is restricted to the first person who is
>>
>>   affected by the illusion. The
>>
>>   > second
>>
>>   person may have the knowledge of nacre, not silver. This
>>  is
>>
>>   why it
>>
>>   > is said avidyAvRtti can be
>>
>>   prAtibhAsika or vyAvahArika.
>>
>>   > If we look
>>
>>   "under the hood" and try to understand what
>>  is
>>
>>   anataHkaraNa
>>
>>   > vRtti and what is
>>
>>   avidyAvRtti, it is important to note that objective
>>
>>   > knowledge, called "pramA", is
>>
>>   gained through a pramANa (means of knowledge,
>>
>>   > such as perception, inference, scriptures,
>>
>>   etc), while subjective
>>
>>   > knowledge,
>>
>>   including the prAtibhAsika type, is not so obtained. In
>>  the
>>
>>   case
>>
>>   > of subjective knowledge, the
>>
>>   witness-consciousness (sAkShicaitanya)
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   cognizes it without the need for antaHkaraNavRtti.  In
>>
>>   contrast, objective
>>
>>   > knowledge gained
>>
>>   through a pramANa results in the modification of the
>>
>>   > antaHkaraNa (mind), called
>>
>>   antaHkaraNavRtti. MahamahopAdhyAya Abhyankar has
>>
>>   > remarked in his commentary on the
>>
>>   siddhAntabindu (dashashlokI):
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   apramAjnAnaM na manovRttirUpaM kiMtu avidyAvRttirUpaM
>>
>>   sAkShyAshrayam.
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   > Anand
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>
>>   > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>
>>   > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   > To unsubscribe or
>>
>>   change your options:
>>
>>   > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   > For assistance,
>>
>>   contact:
>>
>>   > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>>   >
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>>
>>   Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>
>>   http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>>
>>
>>   To unsubscribe or change your
>>
>>   options:
>>
>>   http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>>
>>
>>   For assistance, contact:
>>
>>   listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list